DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT:短影音腳本生成能力比較與使用體驗分享
近期熱門的DeepSeek對OPEN AI帶來了不小的衝擊與影響。撇開技術原理與政治議題,單純以一般使用者的角度進行測試,我針對生成短影音腳本的能力,分兩階段比較了DeepSeek(深度思考R1)與ChatGPT(推理)的免費版本,觀察其內容生成與優化的表現差異。
當然,Prompt的設計是否明確,對內容生成的品質也至關重要。測試結果的具體內容就不贅述,建議大家親自體驗,或許會有不同的感受與見解。
整體結論:兩者各有優勢,適合互相參考與補強。
▍DeepSeek
生成的內容描述詳細且完整,並輔以數據支持,但部分內容可能不夠精確。如果把它比喻為一個人,像是理科男的風格。然而,目前伺服器經常處於忙碌狀態,導致無法連續提問,使用體驗略顯不足。
▍ChatGPT
生成的內容簡潔明瞭,且安全無誤,還會說明內容的風格方向。排版上自帶符號,方便閱讀,經過自我優化後,還能增添數據說明。系統運行穩定,整體使用流暢。
#DeepSeek #ChatGPT #AI應用 #使用體驗分享 #補班
DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: A Comparison of Short Video Script Generation Capabilities and User Experience Review
DeepSeek, which has recently gained popularity, has made a significant impact on OpenAI. Setting aside technical details and political issues, I evaluated its ability to generate short video scripts from a regular user's perspective. I compared the free versions of DeepSeek (Deep Thinking R1) and ChatGPT (Inference) in two phases to observe differences in content creation and optimization.
Naturally, the clarity of the prompt design plays a crucial role in the quality of the generated content. I won’t go into the detailed results here; I encourage you to try them for yourself—you might come away with different impressions.
Overall Conclusion:
Both tools have their unique strengths and can complement each other well.
▍DeepSeek
DeepSeek produces content that is detailed and comprehensive, often supported by data, though some parts may lack precision. If you were to personify it, it would resemble a scientifically minded individual. However, the servers are frequently busy, which makes it difficult to submit consecutive queries and slightly diminishes the overall user experience.
▍ChatGPT
ChatGPT generates clear and concise content that is reliably safe. It even provides explanations about the content's stylistic direction. The built-in formatting makes the text easy to read, and it can include additional data for clarity after self-optimization. The system operates stably, ensuring a smooth overall user experience.
留言
張貼留言